Amazon EFS. Storage Gateway provides a standard set of storage protocols such as iSCSI, SMB, and NFS, which allow you to use AWS storage without rewriting your existing applications. Understanding. However, another key aspect needs to be considered for file storage is performance. 30/GB-month while S3 is $0. 실습 겸 하여 AWS free tier를 사용해, 서버를 구축해보려고 하던 중에, 제일 먼저 저장한 데이터에 대한 처리 및 저장, 공유에 대해 고민하게 되었고, EBS (Elastic Block Store), EFS (Elastic File System), S3 (Simple Storage Service) 를 이야기해보려 한다. As already mentioned EFS is completely different to S3. Create a gateway VPC endpoint for Amazon S3. EBS and EFS are faster than S3 as these are directly mounted on EC2. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. AWS Backup. See moreBackup and DR. Think of a computer’s hard drive. Now it's potential to connect your EFS storage on to on-premise servers via Direct Connect. EC2 Backup Method 1: EBS Snapshots. 1 (NFSv4) protocols. An Amazon EFS Volume Mounted on Multiple EC2 Instances. Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like IAM, S3, S3 Storage Classes and more. Amazon EBS vs EFS vs S3: What’s the Difference? Amazon EBS, EFS, and S3 are different types of storage solutions that Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers to its users. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. 1. AWS EBS AWS S3; Data is stored as blocks: Data is stored as objects: Store block can size up to 16 tebibytes each (17. provides a fully managed NoSQL database service with fast and predictable performance with. Basic object storage that makes data available through an Internet accessible API. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. 02 / GB * month HDD: $0. EBS vs EFS. To know if EFS is the best choice, you’ll want to compare it to your other two main options, EBS and S3. Think photos, videos, files, and simple web pages. EFS. Since EBS is cheaper than EFS, you can use it for. 6, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8. EBS could make sense if you are hyper sensitive to speed (and can't achieve the speeds with S3+other components) and not cost or high availability. 9TB / file IO Throughput Per prefix: 5,500 GET / second 3,500 PUT, DELETE / second (regardless of. If you find our videos useful and wish to support our channel then you can use "Thanks" button to extend your support. 三者ともAWSのストレージサービス。 ⭐️ EBSはデータベースやアプリケーション向けのストレージサービス。高速なI/O Throughput。 ⭐️ S3は静的webpage、マルチメディアの分配. Since EFS is a managed service, we don’t have to worry about maintaining and deploying the FS. 質問6 ある会社に、それぞれのサイズが約 5 MB の多数のファイルを生成. For example, a provisioned EBS volume of 500 GB with 1,000 IOPs would cost $162. . 이 두 스토리지 시스템의 특징과 어느 상황에서 각 서비스를 사용해야 하는지 알아보자. offers pay for the. Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers various…Conclusion. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "A tool to deal with not only servers having low space but also the migration of servers". EFS: An 'elastic' comparison Q: When should I use Amazon EFS vs. 9. Amazon S3 can be accessed from anywhere. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file. Comparing EBS vs. Glacier and more — mainly in terms of durability and availability. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with. js in all three test cases. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system that can be used with on-premises resources and AWS Cloud services. Virginia), U. At just $0. 2. Amazon S3 One Zone - Infrequent Access. EFS is a managed network-attached storage filer for EC2 instances based on network file system (NFS) version 4. Example: How Alpha Vertex uses EFS. 📢 Excited to share my new article on "A Comparison of AWS Storage: S3 vs EBS vs EFS"! 🚀🔥 In the ever-evolving world of cloud computing, storage is a critical aspect of managing and. It seems to be the cheapest for data storage. For EBS - know the difference/use cases of SSD vs HDD, know how to backup, and how to encrypt volumes. Data stored in the S3 Glacier Flexible Retrieval storage class has a minimum storage duration period of 90 days and can be accessed in as little as 1-5 minutes by using an expedited retrieval. 11. Amazon S3 Intelligent Tiering. EFS. It grows and shrinks automatically as you remove or add files, doing away with the requirement to. Upgrade to remove ads. . Compare how they store data before deciding. Sign up. Log in. インスタンスストア. This is. Part of AWS Collective. I've read somewhere that you can use EFS with lambda for this purpose but I think EBS could be used as well but I've not found anyone using that. EBS (Elastic Block Storage!) AWS EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud)에서 사용하도록 설게된 사용하기 쉬운 고성능 블록 스토리지 서비스 AZ. Lesson 19, Topic 6. for Linux EFS and S3 would be fine, S3 would be a lot cheaper. In this article, we will take a look at these three services and also discuss some use cases for these services. EBS and EFS are both faster than Amazon S3, with high IOPS and lower latency. Filerobot. Use S3 Natively. HDFS: Extremely good at scale but is only performant with double or. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. S3 vs EBS vs EFS. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently. In. The example assumes that the two EFS Lifecycle policies to move files between EFS Standard and EFS Standard-IA are set. Since EBS is cheaper than EFS, you can use it for. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. With EBS, you need to pay for. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. AWS offers a comprehensive suite of storage services, catering to diverse workloads and use cases. It is quite expensive but if use S3 as a data lake you can make it affordable (FSx would works as a cache and would only exist while processing your requests). The differences in monthly charges for similar amounts of S3 and EBS with provisioned I/O storage can be substantial. The article “When to Choose Amazon EFS” says: Amazon EFS provides shared file storage for use with compute instances in the AWS Cloud and on-premises servers. Each has its own strength and purpose. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. 6 terabytes) Individual object size can be up to 5,000 gigabytes (5 terabytes) Faster performance than AWS S3: Data does not suffer loss, degradation, or a corruption for a very long time: Data can be modified For performance go for ebs , for cost go for s3. , random access files for an RDBMS) or used by an. Naturally, you would want to back it up. Crea una cuenta o inicia sesión ¡Continúa aprendiendo sin ningún costo! Únete y comienza a potenciar tu carrera. A. As EBS storage is attached to the EC2 instance and is only accessible via that instance in the particular AWS region, it offers less latency than S3 which is accessed via the internet. EFS Systems. The same sized EFS standard share would cost an additional $307 -- or about 21% more with backup and 103% more without backup -- than FSx for Windows. It is similar to hard drives on our physical machines. It is built to scale on-demand to petabytes. EFS. EFS is a virtual disk that can be attached to EC2, and the size of the disk is elastic (scaling up and down depending on usage). So how do these AWS services stack up? Do Amazon EBS costs make it more attractive than Amazon EFS? Does Amazon S3 provide as much reliability as Amazon EFS? In, the table below you’ll be able to. Create. AWS S3 vs EBS vs EFS AWS FSx ( FSx for windows file server & lustre ) 5. What is CloudFormation. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. At the beginning of a 31-day month, your file system stores 1 TB of files on EFS Standard. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. The Difference Explained Mar 27, 2018 Explore topics Workplace Job Search Careers Interviewing Salary and Compensation. voice recognition as a security measure, be aware that achieving a secure voice recognition level will take a lot of time,. Apa perbedaan praktis antara AWS EFS, EBS dan S3? Dari Pemahaman masing-masing: – S3 adalah fasilitas penyimpanan yang dapat diakses di mana saja. EFS: It allows us to mount the FS across multiple regions and instances (accessible from multiple EC2 instances). You can use Amazon ECS to run stateful containerized applications at scale by using AWS storage services, such as Amazon EFS, Amazon EBS, or FSx for Windows File Server, that provide data persistence to inherently ephemeral containers. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system which may be used with on-premises resources and AWS cloud services. The Takeaways. AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Video Course Section 19: Comparison of AWS Services (Versus Section) Amazon S3 vs EFS vs EBS In Progress Lesson 19, Topic 6As the results of the benchmark study show, AWS Lambda Go performed better than AWS Lambda Node. While EFS is a managed elastic file system designed for use across different machines and availability zones, EBS is designed as a fast and reliable block storage volume for single machines (although EBS multi-attach is an exception to this that applies only on very specialized scenarios). An Amazon EFS file system is excellent as a managed network file. With io1 you get to specify IOPS capabilities (S3 has no user specified performance control). However, you should realize that payment is per EFS share and not per machine instance, so the cost of using EFS decreases the more machines you have accessing EFS. (Learn more about EBS storage type in our comparison of Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. Each pod will run a container called “efs-container” which will use an Nginx image. Exam questions involving EFS usually ask the trade-off between cost and efficiency of the service compared to other storage services. The files are to be downloaded from an s3 bucket, processed using ffmpeg and then uploaded back to another s3 bucket. It used to be that you were advised to spread your objects across keys whose first few bytes are as random as possible (or at least are chosen so that queries will be even divided), but they've changed the back end since then such that (according to them) this is no longer necessary. My Loki is installed with Helm so a local file values. AWS storage services are essential fo. ) AWS has an embedded mechanism for the Amazon EBS. . What are the S3 Storage Classes. To make the most of the voice technologies, you need to develop and maintain a solid data infrastructure. Discover which one suits your storage needs best. AWS: EBS vs. Amazon EFS vs S3 for distributed computing. This particular scenario tests your understanding of EBS, EFS, and S3. The files are to be downloaded from an s3 bucket, processed using ffmpeg and then uploaded back to another s3 bucket. Amazon EFS vs Amazon FSx for Windows vs Amazon FSx for Lustre; Amazon Kinesis Data Streams vs Data Firehose vs Data Analytics vs Video Streams; Amazon RDS vs DynamoDB; Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS; Amazon S3 vs Glacier; Amazon Simple Workflow (SWF) vs AWS Step Functions vs Amazon SQS; Application Load Balancer vs Network. Create custom user. EBS volumes have the following features: EBS volumes preserve their data through instance stops and terminations. ” However, this argument was written before AWS announced DataSync’s new agentless in-cloud transfer capabilities, like for going directly from the EFS file system to S3. 4 Million) which may be good for some applications. 1 vs . You can also use AWS EFS to serve web content, keep various backups, and reduce storage spending. AWS EBS Volume Backup with EBS Snapshots; Cloning Amazon EBS Volumes: A Solution to the AWS EBS Cloning Problem; AWS EFS. Now, I need an object storage service for my app, and my options are: Amazon S3 : It sounds to me like the best option but the most expensive. In comparison, one Amazon S3 object can be 5 TB and you can store unlimited objects of 5 TB in Amazon S3. We’re here to give you an overview of AWS storage, breaking down what Amazon S3, EBS and Glacier are designed for, how they’re different, while offering you guidance on when to use each service. EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. Amazon EBS is designed to store data in blocks (volumes of a provisioned size) attached to an Amazon EC2 instance, similar to a local disk drive on your physical machine. How to use Auto Scaling. The EBS provides persistent block storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances. Proyecto de arquitectura e implementación de almacenamiento 2 /37. PDF RSS. FAq for comparison s3 v/s ebs v/s efs. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. EBS is a block storage service: EFS is a file storage system. Use EFS (Correct) Upgrade your existing EBS volumes to Provisioned IOPS SSD Volumes Create an S3 bucket and use this as the storage for the CMS Use ElastiCache Explanation Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable, elastic file storage for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. . In this article, we will take a look at these three services and also discuss some use cases for these services. EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. Conclusion. EBS(Elastic block storage) is a block-level storage service provided by Amazon and it is basically designed. Hot Network Questions How can I import a VCARD file (contact information) via a QR code into. Conclusion. In. 09/GB) • Enabling users to get only the data they need will lower egress charges 5. e. RDS vs DynamoDB. 045 / GB * month SSD: $0. Task 1: Creating the EFS File System. EFS is useful for Content Management Systems (CMS) and Software as s Service (SaaS) apps. Las clases de almacenamiento de S3 se pueden configurar en el nivel de objeto y un solo bucket puede contener objetos almacenados en S3 Estándar, S3 Capas inteligentes, S3. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a local. AWS Storage S3 vs EBS vs EFS, Cuándo usar cada uno. Learn about AWS EFS, your backup options, how to optimize performance, see a brief comparison of EFS vs EBS vs S3, and discover how Cloud Volumes ONTAP can help. offers pay for the. AWS DataSync also supports data movement between FSx for ONTAP shares and other AWS services, including other services in the FSx family, Amazon EFS, and Amazon S3. Using an EFS file system, you may configure instances to mount the file system. With a single API call, EBS can be scaled up or down. Ofcourse there would be read/write latency compared to EBS as EBS is designed for low-latency access to data. The other most popular file storage services provided by AWS are EBS and S3. Aws S3. If you enjoyed this content, please lets us know in the comments section below. Great for Data lakes, archiving files for long-term, and hosting static websites. 30/GB-month while S3 is $0. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. EBS volumes can be attached to both Windows and non-Windows EC2 machines, whereas EFS volumes are designed for Linux-based hosts only. Amazon EFS vs Amazon FSx for Windows vs Amazon FSx for Lustre; Amazon Kinesis Data Streams vs Data Firehose vs Data Analytics vs Video Streams; Amazon RDS vs DynamoDB; Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS; Amazon S3 vs Glacier; Amazon Simple Workflow (SWF) vs AWS Step Functions vs Amazon SQS; Application Load Balancer vs Network. Multiple volumes can be mounted to the same instance. Amazon EBS Benefits. EBS vs. Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is typically used for storing and managing unstructured data, and it is not typically used directly for EC2 instances or Kubernetes clusters in the real world. Configure the ReplicaSet to mount the file system. In general EBS will perform better than S3 (EBS has 4 variations - gp2, io1, st1, sc1). Object: S3, Glacier. This is why, in. AWS EBS - Elastic Block Store is block-level storage that is attached as a drive for your virtual machines. Which of these AWS EBS vs EFS vs S3 Storage Solutions Is for You? The choice of migrating to AWS solution such as EBS, EFS, and S3 depends on your specific needs: Amazon EBS is a good choice if you need high-performance block storage for databases or applications with low-latency demands. Whereas EBS wouldn’t scale automatically. This video AWS Storage - S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison is designed to teach you the storage options on the AWS platform. That same amount of S3 storage would cost $47. It would not be available in your region. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Of the three options, Amazon S3 is cheapest and can be configured to be accessed from anywhere. EBS (Elastic Block Store): ; Persistent block storage volumes ; Better for storing operating systems. EFS: An 'elastic'. The Difference Explained. EFS blows way past S3 just in storage costs. Pilotcore Feb 9, 2021 · 9 min read Table of Contents Amazon Web Services storage options Elastic Block Store EC2 Instance Store vs EBS Which sort of storage do Amazon EFS. EFS is file system storage, using NFSv4 protocol. S3 vs. Faster than S3, slower than EbS. 質問7 ある会社は、ユーザーが小さなファイルを Amazon S3 にアップロ. . No tienes acceso a esta clase ¡Continúa aprendiendo! Únete y comienza a potenciar tu carrera. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. Comparing EBS vs. 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. Naturally, you would want to back it up. 0 (less than 1,000 files per second). To know whether EFS truly is the best option for you, you’ll want to compare it to your other two main options, EBS and S3. File Gateway. However, in terms of performance, EBS and EFS are superior to S3, with stronger throughput and the lowest latency. Introduction S3. S3 is highly scalable, available, affordable, secure, durable, and simple to use through a web-based interface, the Amazon S3 Console. Depending on your requirements you may be able to use S3 natively, calling the S3 API, or. gp2 has IO bursts (up to 3000 IOPS) and IO credits (5. . Elastic File Store – EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. The main difference between EBS and EFS is that EBS is only accessible from a single EC2 instance in your particular AWS region, while EFS allows you to mount the file system across multiple regions and instances. In short, S3 is for object storage, EBS for block storage and EFS for. supports transferring data from or to S3 and EFS. PDF RSS. Highly available, Durable, and Flexible. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). 30 GB-month ($6. Two fundamental types of storage provided by AWS are block storage and object storage. Go to EFS from the main console and give a name for your EFS file system (optional)2. Curso Práctico de Storage en AWS. 37. Object Storage vs File System vs Block Storage. EFS vs EBS Multi-Attach features. Every server needs a drive. Broadly, you’ll be asked questions around: The difference, usage and advantages of S3 standard vs S3 standard-IA vs S3 one zone-IA vs Glacier vs Glacier Archive. 1 provides better performance for parallel small-file read operations (greater than 10,000 files per second) compared to NFSv4. With a single API call, EBS can be scaled up or down. Lets’ learn about the differences of Amazon EBS, EFS, and S3 and make informed decisions for your data storage needs. Assume that your file system is located in the US East (N. Amazon EFS - Simple, scalable, and reliable file storage for the AWS Cloud. In this article, we will discuss these storage solutions in detail along with their differences. TL;DR: Amazon EFS is an NFS file system service offered by AWS. S3 vs EBS vs EFS The difference between these three types of storage is, EBS is only accessible from a single EC2 instance, while EFS allows you to mount the file system across multiple regions. Google Cloud Filestore - High-performance, fully managed file storage. See top articles in our guide. Amazon S3-é um armazenamento baseado em objetos onde cada item é armazenado com um URL Uma das diferenças é - EBS pode ser anexado a uma instância de cada vez e EFS pode ser anexado a várias instâncias que por isso armazenamento compartilhado. EBS. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS In this Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS, we will discuss the differences between Amazon S3, EBS, and EFS. 4 Answers. Amazon Simple Storage Service. The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. Networking Parameters - Subnet, Network ACL, Route Table, Internet Gateway, Router etc. EBS has a lower price per GB-month compared to EFS—$0. To prevent unintentional changes or data loss, it's a best. Amazon S3. Amazon S3 is perhaps the most popular of all the AWS storage types. S. Crear una llave con SSE-S3. Insights from the community Systems Management How can you optimize server storage for big data?. While EFS does cost more than EBS ($0. It scales transparently behind the scenes. EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Because it allows multiple instances to connect across regions and AZs, it. It stores files in multiple volumes where data is split into “blocks” that function as separate hard drives. However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. . Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service), EBS (Elastic Block Store) and EFS (Elastic. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". 742,673 professionals have used our research since 2012. O armazenamento de objectos simples S2 não pode ser montado. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that gives you on-premises access to virtually unlimited cloud storage. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system that can be used with on-premises resources and AWS Cloud services. yaml is used for specifying some customized configurations. 2 Use cases 2 Amazon EBS 2. FSx for Windows is currently available in four regions: U. O armazenamento de objectos simples S2 não pode ser montado. S3 vs. Go to EFS from the main console and give a name for your EFS file system (optional)2. Create custom user. Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance. The Takeaways. 1 What. This drive, in AWS terms, is an Amazon EBS volume. EBS vs. . 3. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. EFS - EFS is a service highly associated with EC2, much like EBS. Crear cuenta. Object: S3, Glacier. AWS Certified Solutions Architect Associate SAA-C03 Video Course Section 19: Comparison of AWS Services (Versus Section) Amazon S3 vs EFS vs EBS. Sorted by: 3. →最大数千の ec2 インスタンスからの同時アクセスが可能. 37. Amazon Storage Services: EFS vs EBS vs S3. EBS volumes that are attached to an instance are exposed as storage volumes that persist independently from. Amazon Elastic Block Storage (EBS), is essentially cloud-based storage for the drives of your virtual machines – just like a D. AWS EFS vs S3 vs EBS; AWS EFS pricing; Conclusion; Check out this AWS full course video by Intellipaat. How to Choose the Right AWS Storage Solution for your Project - S3, EFS, EBS or RDS. Crear cuenta. S3的主要特点是数据的高持久性、可用性和安全性，以及灵活的存储桶概念和可配置的数据访问控制。 EBS，即Elastic Block Store弹性块存储，是AWS提供的块存储服务。EBS是一块持久化存储设备，可以像磁盘一样被挂载到具体的EC2实例上，以提供持久化存. Here are the key features and architectural benefits of each one: Amazon EBS . Setup Loki for S3. In this Ec2 instance use the key created in Step 2 and the security group which has been created in Step 1. EFS would $60/month for 200GB to store the data, but $4. The simplest way to look at is to look at what the underlying technology is. The service stores files as native S3 objects, archives virtual tapes in Amazon Glacier, and stores EBS Snapshots generated by the Volume Gateway with Amazon EBS. How to Secure Ec2 instance. Now that this serverless capability exists, AWS DataSync seems. Amazon Web Services (AWS) offers various storage options to cater to different requirements. Networking – These include VPC,. Pretty straight forward. So if i use AWS EFS or EBS there wont be any necessity for the API call to S3. Características de S3. Configure a Site-to-Site VPN connection from the facility network to the VPC so that sensor data can be written directly to an S3 bucket by way of the VPC endpoint. This video AWS Storage - S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison is designed to teach you the storage options on the AWS platform. In general EBS will perform better than S3 (EBS has 4 variations - gp2, io1, st1, sc1). By combining them together, we got four classes. Storage services comparision: S3 vs EBS vs EFS vs FSX. Amazon EFS vs Amazon FSx for Windows vs Amazon FSx for Lustre; Amazon Kinesis Data Streams vs Data Firehose vs Data Analytics vs Video Streams; Amazon RDS vs DynamoDB; Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS; Amazon S3 vs Glacier; Amazon Simple Workflow (SWF) vs AWS Step Functions vs Amazon SQS; Application Load Balancer vs Network. The option that says: Use AWS DataSync to move the data. It is important to note that these results may vary based on the specific use case. Storage Gateway. This means that if you attach a dozen instances to it, you will still pay the same amount as if you only had one instance. ( However it’s easy to add more storage to your EBS volumes, it requires some engineering, which means you always “overpay” your EBS storage, which makes it. Next Steps. EBS. EBS SNAPSHOTS. Explanation In this question, you should take note of the two keywords/phrases: "file operation" and "allows concurrent connections from multiple EC2 instances". EBS volumes are suitable for applications that require low-latency access to data and need to be treated as a traditional hard drive. Currently, I'm using the /tmp/ directory by lambda but it has a limit of 512 mbs. Which AWS Cloud Storage Service Is Best? As always, it depends. No es rapido, es decir, no es más rapido que un EBS por el contrario es mucho menor, lo defino como normal y aceptable de acuerdo con la necesidad IO que tengas sobre este. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. 2 Use cases 3 Amazon EFS 3. 12 min read · DevOps Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). AWS gives us three different storage services – EBS, EFS and S3. The three basic types of cloud services are: Here are some of the AWS products that are built based on the three cloud service types: Computing – These include EC2, Elastic Beanstalk, Lambda, Auto-Scaling, and Lightsat. Amazon S3 provides durability by redundantly storing the data across multiple Availability Zones whereas EBS provides durability by redundantly storing the. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a local. The simplest way to look at is to look at what the underlying technology is.